Macro scenario stress tests
Twelve-month shocks applied to the 30 October 2026 base of $983,537. Each holding carries a shock judged from its published composition, beta, currency treatment and its behaviour in the March 2026 correction and the July 2026 AI unwind; cash earns 4 per cent in all cases. Dollar figures rescale automatically to the latest marks.
Results and probabilities
Probabilities are editable planning weights; the remaining probability is the muddle-through base case.
| Scenario | Probability | Invested sleeve | Total portfolio | Dollar impact | Weighted | If the AUD does not move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: AI bubble burst | % | −13.7% | −12.4% | −$122k | −$43k | about −16% if the AUD does not move |
| B: US dollar decline (DXY −15%, AUD → ~82¢) | % | +0.7% | +1.0% | +$10k | +$2k | n/a |
| B2: US dollar spike (risk-off, AUD −12%, local equities −8%) | % | −2.7% | −2.2% | −$22k | −$3k | n/a |
| C: General downturn (global equities −25%, ASX −20%, small caps −25%) | % | −18.1% | −16.5% | −$162k | −$40k | about −20% if the AUD does not move |
| Muddle-through base case (remaining probability) | 0% | none of the shocks arrives at full scale | ||||
Probabilities are subjective planning weights, not forecasts. The scenarios overlap — an AI bust would very likely also deliver the general downturn — so the expected values must not be summed; the remaining probability is the muddle-through base case.
Modelled twelve-month impact by holding
$ thousand, on the latest values, under the three primary scenarios (B2 is the mirror of B and is shown in its own section).
Figure: modelled twelve-month impact by holding under the three scenarios, $ thousand, on 30 October 2026 values (cash earns 4 per cent in all cases).
Scenario A — AI bubble burst
Probability 35 per cent · invested −13.7% · total −12.4% · −$122k · about −16% if the AUD does not move
Hyperscaler capex is running at roughly US$750–800bn for 2026, about 93 per cent of operating cash flow (33 per cent in 2023). Consensus has US semiconductor earnings growing 98 per cent; NVIDIA is 7–8 per cent of the S&P 500 above US$5 trillion.
Financing has moved down the ladder: Oracle US$55.7bn capex against US$32bn operating cash flow; J.P. Morgan estimates US$1.5 trillion of new technology debt over three years; NVIDIA announced chip-collateralised financing vehicles on 10 August.
July 2026 was the rehearsal: Korea −24 per cent, small-cap tech −12 per cent, networking names −26 per cent in a month. October added Alphabet −12.6 per cent in a day and Intel −29 per cent.
Transmission and result
Look-through AI exposure is about 10 per cent of the portfolio (~$104k): roughly 30 per cent of VGAD, 30 per cent of Ashmore, 20 per cent of Plato and 15 per cent of Barwon; MFS, Langdon, Talaria and Perennial hold essentially none.
Largest modelled losses VGAD, Ashmore and Barwon; the Australian sleeve loses about $48k through risk-off and small-cap de-rating. Offsets: MFS roughly flat, Talaria, Langdon and the hedged defensives — the portfolio loses about half of what VGAD alone would.
Most exposed
Natural offsets
Cheapest fix
What to watch. Nasdaq-100 and semiconductor index 50-day below 200-day; hyperscaler 2027 capex guidance cuts; AI-debt spreads (Oracle, CoreWeave, NVIDIA-collateralised vehicles); Korea and Taiwan leading declines; equal-weight S&P outperforming cap-weight.
Mitigation. VGAD is the cheapest reduction (28 per cent in ten AI-linked names): a hedged equal-weight or value-tilted global index would cut look-through AI exposure by roughly a third. Ashmore's semiconductor concentration is the less obvious exposure. Langdon and MFS are the natural offsets and argue against cutting Langdon entirely.
Impact by holding, $
- VGAD−$25k
- Ashmore EM−$14k
- Barwon−$12k
- MQAE−$12k
- Plato−$11k
- Macquarie Small Cos−$11k
- First Sentier−$11k
- Langdon−$6k
- Perennial−$6k
- Quay−$6k
- Spheria−$5k
- Lazard Infra−$5k
- Talaria−$1k
- MFS Contrarian$0k
Cash +$3k · total −$122k
By sleeve
| Australian equities | −$45k | −17.4% |
| Global equities | −$56k | −12.7% |
| Property & infrastructure | −$11k | −9.0% |
| Alternatives | −$13k | −14.4% |
The portfolio after the shock
Now
- Australian equities 26.2%
- Global equities 44.9%
- Property & infrastructure 12.2%
- Alternatives 9.1%
- Net cash 7.6%
After scenario A ($861,669)
- Australian equities 24.7%
- Global equities 44.7%
- Property & infrastructure 12.7%
- Alternatives 8.9%
- Net cash 9.0%
Scenario B — US dollar decline (DXY −15%, AUD → ~82¢)
Probability 25 per cent · invested +0.7% · total +1.0% · +$10k
The Fed hiked on 16 September and held on 28 October with two hawkish dissents; the DXY sits near 101–102, still roughly 15 per cent overvalued on Morningstar's model; the Treasury's buyback programme keeps the debt-dynamics tail risk alive.
AUD/USD at 70.4 US cents with the RBA at 4.60 per cent and a further hike priced for 3 November compresses the rate differential that has supported the dollar. Gold's fall to a 12-month low in October cut against the thesis for now.
Transmission and result
Translation losses on the six unhedged funds of roughly $28–40k are offset by commodities and miners (Perennial +$8k, MQAE +$4k) and the hedged sleeve → net about +1 per cent. Most exposed: Plato, MFS, Talaria.
The dangerous combination is B plus C (foreign selling of US assets): the currency cushion disappears and the outcome moves toward −20 per cent.
Most exposed
Natural offsets
Cheapest fix
What to watch. DXY vs its 100-day average near 99.5 with the descending trendline intact; AUD/USD reclaiming 72.5 cents; gold; Treasury auction tails and the buyback programme; Fed-cut vs RBA-hold timing.
Mitigation. The hedge ratio is the dial: 44 per cent unhedged brought to roughly 30 per cent (hedged classes of Plato or MFS where they exist, or hedged index exposure) halves the B loss on those funds at the cost of the B2 cushion.
Impact by holding, $
- Plato−$6k
- MFS Contrarian−$4k
- Talaria−$2k
- Langdon−$2k
- Barwon−$1k
- Spheria$1k
- First Sentier$1k
- Lazard Infra$1k
- Macquarie Small Cos$2k
- Quay$2k
- Ashmore EM$2k
- VGAD$3k
- MQAE$4k
- Perennial$6k
Cash +$3k · total +$10k
By sleeve
| Australian equities | +$14k | +5.3% |
| Global equities | −$7k | −1.6% |
| Property & infrastructure | +$3k | +2.5% |
| Alternatives | −$3k | −3.5% |
The portfolio after the shock
Now
- Australian equities 26.2%
- Global equities 44.9%
- Property & infrastructure 12.2%
- Alternatives 9.1%
- Net cash 7.6%
After scenario B ($993,039)
- Australian equities 27.3%
- Global equities 43.8%
- Property & infrastructure 12.4%
- Alternatives 8.7%
- Net cash 7.8%
Scenario B2 — US dollar spike (risk-off, AUD −12%, local equities −8%)
Probability 15 per cent · invested −2.7% · total −2.2% · −$22k
A dollar spike in a risk-off episode: AUD −12 per cent, equities −8 per cent locally. September 2026 was this configuration in miniature, except that the AUD rose.
Transmission and result
The unhedged sleeve becomes the hedge (+$20k across Plato, MFS, Langdon, Talaria and Barwon) and the portfolio loses only about 2 per cent. This is the more common pattern and the reason 44 per cent unhedged is not obviously wrong for an Australian investor.
Most exposed
Natural offsets
Cheapest fix
What to watch. AUD/USD breaking below 68 cents with equities falling; the DXY above 104.
Mitigation. None needed: the unhedged sleeve is the cushion. Hedging more (the B fix) gives this up.
Impact by holding, $
- VGAD−$9k
- MQAE−$7k
- Lazard Infra−$6k
- Quay−$6k
- Macquarie Small Cos−$5k
- First Sentier−$4k
- Perennial−$4k
- Spheria−$3k
- Talaria$2k
- Barwon$2k
- Ashmore EM$3k
- Langdon$4k
- Plato$5k
- MFS Contrarian$5k
Cash +$3k · total −$22k
By sleeve
| Australian equities | −$23k | −9.0% |
| Global equities | +$6k | +1.4% |
| Property & infrastructure | −$12k | −10.0% |
| Alternatives | +$4k | +4.5% |
The portfolio after the shock
Now
- Australian equities 26.2%
- Global equities 44.9%
- Property & infrastructure 12.2%
- Alternatives 9.1%
- Net cash 7.6%
After scenario B2 ($961,820)
- Australian equities 24.3%
- Global equities 46.6%
- Property & infrastructure 11.2%
- Alternatives 9.7%
- Net cash 8.1%
Scenario C — General downturn (global equities −25%, ASX −20%, small caps −25%)
Probability 25 per cent · invested −18.1% · total −16.5% · −$162k · about −20% if the AUD does not move
The scenario has been rehearsing itself: the Fed hiked in September, the RBA hiked to 4.60 per cent on 29 September with another priced for 3 November, and the ASX 200 fell four consecutive weeks to 8,665 before October's rotation. Unemployment 4.6 per cent with CPI overshooting is the uncomfortable combination.
The March 2026 episode is the fuller template: an oil shock plus rate fears took the ASX 200 down 10 per cent peak to trough in three weeks; MQAE's NAV fell 9.7 per cent, Spheria 12.6 per cent in the month, Langdon roughly 15 per cent in the quarter.
Transmission and result
A recession bear market costs about 17 per cent of the total portfolio. The Australian sleeve loses the most in dollars (small, micro and resources are 22 per cent of the book); VGAD and Langdon lead global losses; only Talaria, Lazard and cash hold up.
About 93 per cent growth assets, weighted beta near 1.0, no fixed interest, gold or absolute return; cash plus the currency cushion are worth about 4 points of protection.
Most exposed
Natural offsets
Cheapest fix
What to watch. ASX 200 losing 9,000, then the 200-day near 8,800, then the March low 8,457; MQAE NAV below 11.83; Spheria below 1.81; MQAE 50-day below 200-day; Australian credit spreads and bank provisioning; RBA language.
Mitigation. Duration is the missing asset: 10–15 per cent in Australian government or investment-grade bonds at ~5 per cent yields offsets a meaningful part of C while the rate cycle is at or near its peak. Trimming small, micro and resources from 22 toward 15 per cent reduces beta more cheaply than any other change; Perennial is the largest single scenario-C loss for its size.
Impact by holding, $
- VGAD−$23k
- MQAE−$17k
- Langdon−$16k
- Macquarie Small Cos−$14k
- MFS Contrarian−$13k
- Barwon−$13k
- Perennial−$12k
- First Sentier−$12k
- Ashmore EM−$11k
- Plato−$10k
- Quay−$9k
- Spheria−$7k
- Lazard Infra−$5k
- Talaria−$2k
Cash +$3k · total −$162k
By sleeve
| Australian equities | −$62k | −24.0% |
| Global equities | −$74k | −16.7% |
| Property & infrastructure | −$14k | −11.4% |
| Alternatives | −$16k | −17.4% |
The portfolio after the shock
Now
- Australian equities 26.2%
- Global equities 44.9%
- Property & infrastructure 12.2%
- Alternatives 9.1%
- Net cash 7.6%
After scenario C ($821,669)
- Australian equities 23.8%
- Global equities 44.8%
- Property & infrastructure 12.9%
- Alternatives 9.0%
- Net cash 9.5%
Summary
The three primary scenarios side by side.
| A: AI bust | B: USD decline | C: Downturn | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio impact | −12.6% (−16% ex-FX) | +1% | −16.7% (−20% ex-FX) |
| Most exposed | VGAD, Ashmore, Barwon | Plato, MFS, Talaria | VGAD, MQAE, Langdon, Perennial |
| Natural offsets | MFS, Talaria, Langdon, AUD fall | Perennial, MQAE, hedged sleeve | Talaria, Lazard, cash, AUD fall |
| Cheapest fix | Reduce VGAD's cap-weighted exposure | Adjust the hedge ratio on global equities | Add duration; trim small/resources beta |
- The AUD provides 3–4 points of the protection in A and C: roughly that much of the modelled cushion comes from assuming the currency behaves as it usually does in risk-off.
- The performance-reconsideration list (First Sentier, Quay) differs from the scenario-risk list (VGAD, Ashmore, Barwon, Perennial), so the two decisions are separable.
- Shocks are the September report's judgements; dollar figures rescale automatically to the latest marks.
Assumed shocks
Per cent change in AUD value over twelve months, and the basis for each. A and C assume AUD/USD falls 8 per cent (its usual risk-off behaviour); B assumes it rises about 16 per cent to around 82 US cents with the DXY down 15 per cent; B2 assumes it falls 12 per cent.
| Holding | A | B | B2* | C | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Sentier | −22% | +2% | −9% | −24% | IT and health-care overweights, beta 1.1 to 1.3 |
| Macquarie Small Cos | −20% | +3% | −9% | −25% | Small-cap tech fell 12% in the July unwind |
| MQAE | −14% | +5% | −9% | −20% | Banks and miners; ASX IT only 2%; miners benefit from a weak USD |
| Perennial | −15% | +15% | −9% | −30% | AI capex drives copper and energy demand; weak USD lifts commodities; recession hits resources hardest |
| Spheria | −18% | +3% | −9% | −25% | Micro caps, quality tilt |
| Lazard Infra | −8% | +2% | −10% | −8% | Regulated assets; AI-power utilities de-rate in A; yields fall in C |
| Quay | −10% | +3% | −10% | −15% | Data-centre REITs hit in A; rent-based book otherwise defensive |
| Barwon | −24% | −3% | +5% | −27% | Listed PE discounts widen in stress; tech-heavy PE books; credit sensitivity |
| Talaria | −3% | −4% | +5% | −6% | Put-writing income and cash cushion; value tilt |
| Ashmore EM | −24% | +4% | +5% | −20% | TSMC largest holding; Taiwan and Korea semis dominate EM |
| Langdon | −8% | −2% | +5% | −20% | Zero IT hardware, 36% financials, small caps de-rate in recession; 32% US |
| MFS Contrarian | 0% | −4% | +5% | −12% | Value, IT 2.9%, forward P/E 13x, Europe-heavy; unhedged |
| Plato | −11% | −6% | +5% | −10% | Beta 1.0 but 63% downside capture; long/short; unhedged, mostly US |
| VGAD | −27% | +3% | −10% | −25% | 73% US, IT 29%, top ten 28% (NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Broadcom, Meta, JPM, Micron, Lilly); hedged so no FX offset |
| Cash | +4% | +4% | +4% | +4% | Earns 4 per cent in all cases |
*B2's per-holding shocks are derived here from the September report's sleeve-level description; the brief gives B2 at portfolio level only (−2.8 per cent invested, −$23k on the 25 September base).
Analysis and modelling for discussion, not personal financial advice.